Comparison Between Aristotle And Kant - 1388 Words

Anuradha Singh Ethics Fall 2014 Comparison between Aristotle and Kant Many philosophers through history have dealt with happiness, pleasure, justice, and virtues. In this essay there will given facts on virtues between two philosophers who have different views on the topic. Aristotle and Kant have two totally different views on virtue, one being based on the soul and how you character depicts you virtue and the other which is based of the fact that anyone has a chance of being morally good, even bad people. There is a lot of disagreement between Aristotle and Kant, which has examples to back the disagreements. Aristotle takes virtue as an excellence, while Kant takes it more to being a person doing something morally good in the society and for them as a person. One similarity between these two philosophers though, is that these two descriptions of virtue lead back to happiness in the individual. At the end of this essay, the reader should be capable of understanding that Aristotle’s theory is more supported than Kant’s theory. Of course, explanations for both sides will be given thoroughly throughout this comparison. Aristotle’s theory will be discussed in full length on his theory of virtue. Now Aristotle did believe in a multitude of theories that are all based off of virtue, but also the soul. To Aristotle, virtue is an excellence, which comes after happiness and achieving our final goal. When Aristotle talks about an individual’s final goal and excellence of thatShow MoreRelatedKant And Aristotle s Views On Ethics And Morals1480 Words   |  6 PagesStrom Philosophy 300 Class Section 1200 Recitation-Tuesday 10am 2/11/2015 What Is The Highest Good? Immanuel Kant and Aristotle are two of the most prominent philosophers on ethics and morals. Each has their own idea about human life and what the highest good is. It has even been said that in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Kant disproves Aristotle’s view. In order to prove that Kant successfully disproves Aristotle’s theory, we must first understand both theories. After a successful understandingRead More Ethical and Philosophical Questions about Value and Obligation977 Words   |  4 PagesEthical and Philosophical Questions about Value and Obligation I Recall the distinction between metaethics and normative ethics. Normative ethics deals with substantial ethical issues, such as, What is intrinsically good? What are our moral obligations? Metaethics deals with philosophical issues about ethics: What is value or moral obligation? Are there ethical facts? What sort of objectivity is possible in ethics? How can we have ethical knowledge? Recall, also, the fundamentalRead MoreComparing Aristotle And John Stuart Mill1130 Words   |  5 Pages PHIL 231: Ethics 28 April 2015 Essay 2 Comparisons on Pleasure in Morality The role of pleasure in morality has been examined thoroughly throughout the beginning of philosophy and continues to be a questionable issue. With these in-depth examinations, some similar outlooks as well as differing views have been recorded. Many philosophers have dissected this important topic, however I intend to concentrate of the famous works of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. After meticulouslyRead MoreThe Ethics Of Virtue Ethics925 Words   |  4 PagesVirtue ethics is a normative theory whose foundations were laid by Aristotle. This theory approaches normative ethics in substantially different ways than consequentialist and deontological theories. In this essay, I will contrast and compare virtue ethics to utilitarianism, ethical egoism, and Kantianism to demonstrate these differences. There is one fundamental aspect of virtue ethics that sets it apart from the other theories I will discuss. For the sake of brevity and to avoid redundancy, I willRead M oreThe Role Of Happiness . â€Å"Happiness Is The Meaning And The1326 Words   |  6 Pagesexistence† (Aristotle). In ethics, we study the place of morality in a social construct, where happiness is the core of ethical concern. Happiness for the individual, happiness for the majority, happiness for nature. What is the key to a happy life? Aristotle believes the key is eudaimonia, or a state of having a good soul or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy, and prosperous. Eudaimonia is often used to refer to the right actions that result in the well-being of the individual. Kant howeverRead MoreAristotle And Kant : Virtue Ethics1847 Words   |  8 PagesAristotle and Kant are great philosophers who have made substantial efforts to focus on the issue of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics is a wide term for principles that focus on the moral act that brings about good values. Aristotle and Kant are virtue ethicist since they attempt to offer moral advice to the society. M ost virtue ethicist emulates Aristotle who affirmed that a righteous person should have the ideal traits. These traits originate from natural innermost tendencies but societies need toRead MoreExploring Ethics2165 Words   |  9 PagesComparison of Aristotle, Kant, and Mill T.H. Aristotle represents virtue ethics, Kant represents duty ethics, and Mill represents utilitarianism. All three authors conceive of morality as the search for the highest good. They disagree about the deï ¬ nition of the highest good. For Aristotele, it is happiness understood as self-sufï ¬ ciency (fulï ¬ llment of all desires), consisting in activity in conformity with virtue (EN 1.7), for Kant it is a good will, deï ¬ ned by duty (GMM, ed. Ellington, p. 7:393;Read MoreDifference in Metaphysics Between Aristotle and Kant2285 Words   |  10 PagesWhat is the central difference between metaphysics as Kant conceives it, and metaphysics as Aristotle conceives it? Argue in support of one or the other view. Metaphysics is usually taken to involve both questions of what is existence and what types of things exist; in order to answer either questions, one will find itself using and investigating the concepts of being. Aristotle  proposed the first of these investigations which he called ‘first philosophy’, also known as ‘the science of being’ howeverRead MoreKant s Theory Of Nature Of Virtue1199 Words   |  5 PagesIn this paper, the comparison of Immanuel Kant’s theory of The Categorical Imperative and Aristotle’s theory of Nature of Virtue is discussed. Kant’s theory will tell a categorical imperative, a hypothetical imperative, meaning of a maxim, a control condition, the meaning of good will, desires versus the reason and lastly, the formula of universal law. Aristotle’s theory will discuss the role of habituation, the life of rational activity, the function of humans, the meaning of eudemonia, the lifeRead MorePhilosophy Of Ar istotle And Kant1780 Words   |  8 Pagespractical deliberation in the works of Aristotle and Kant. Although traditionally seen as polar opposites, there is a substantial overlap in both philosopher’s conclusions about practical deliberation and principles of actions, which make for different understanding, assu- ming the interpretations seen so far (i.e. dealing away with a stringent understanding of Kant as a rule-moralist). The essay will follow first an understanding of practical reason for Aristotle, fol- lowed by an interpretation of