Richard Ewell - Civil War - Lieutenant General - Army of Northern Virginia

Richard Ewell - Civil War - Lieutenant General - Army of Northern Virginia Richard Ewell - Early Life Career: The grandson of the primary US Secretary of the Navy, Benjamin Stoddert, Richard Stoddert Ewell was conceived in Georgetown, DC on February 8, 1817. Brought up in close by Manassas, VA by his folks, Dr. Thomas and Elizabeth Ewell, he got his underlying instruction locally before choosing to leave on a military vocation. Applying to West Point, he was acknowledged and entered the institute in 1836. A better than expected understudy, Ewell graduated in 1840 positioned thirteenth in a class of forty-two. Dispatched as a subsequent lieutenant, he got requests to join the first US Dragoons which were working on the outskirts. In this job, Ewell helped with accompanying cart trains of dealers and pioneers on the Santa Fe and Oregon Trails while additionally taking in his exchange from lights, for example, Colonel Stephen W. Kearny. Richard Ewell - Mexican-American War: Elevated to first lieutenant in 1845, Ewell stayed on the wilderness until the episode of the Mexican-American War the next year. Allocated to Major General Winfield Scotts armed force in 1847, he partook in the crusade against Mexico City. Serving in Captain Philip Kearnys organization of the first Dragoons, Ewell participated in tasks against Veracruz and Cerro Gordo. In late August, Ewell got a brevet advancement to commander for his courageous help during the clashes of Contreras and Churubusco. With the finish of the war, he returned north and served at Baltimore, MD. Elevated to the perpetual evaluation of skipper in 1849, Ewell got orders for the New Mexico Territory the next year. There he directed activities against the Native Americans just as investigated the recently obtained Gadsen Purchase. Later provided order of Fort Buchanan, Ewell applied for debilitated leave in late 1860 and returned east in January 1861. Richard Ewell - The Civil War Begins: Ewell was recovering in Virginia when the Civil War started in April 1861. With the severance of Virginia, he made plans to leave the US Army and look for work in the Southern assistance. Officially leaving on May 7, Ewell acknowledged an arrangement as a colonel of rangers in the Virginia Provisional Army. On May 31, he was somewhat injured during an encounter with Union powers close Fairfax Court House. Recuperating, Ewell acknowledged a commission as a brigadier general in the Confederate Army on June 17. Given a detachment in Brigadier General P.G.T. Beauregards Army of the Potomac, he was available a the First Battle of Bull Run on July 21, yet considered little to be as his men were entrusted with guarding Union Mills Ford. Elevated to significant general on January 24, 1862, Ewell got arranges later that spring to assume responsibility for a division in Major General Thomas Stonewall Jacksons armed force in the Shenandoah Valley. Richard Ewell - Campaigning in the Valley Peninsula: Joining Jackson, Ewell assumed key jobs in a string of astounding triumphs over prevalent Union powers drove by Major Generals John C. Frã ©mont, Nathaniel P. Banks, and James Shields. In June, Jackson and Ewell withdrew the Valley with requests to join General Robert E. Dregs armed force on the Peninsula for an assault on Major General George B. McClellans Army of the Potomac. During the subsequent Seven Days Battles, he partook in the battling at Gaines Mill and Malvern Hill. With McClellan contained on the Peninsula, Lee guided Jackson to move north to manage Major General John Popes recently shaped Army of Virginia. Propelling, Jackson and Ewell vanquished a power drove by Banks at Cedar Mountain on August 9. Later in the month, they connected with Pope in the Second Battle of Manassas. As the battling seethed on August 29, Ewell had his left leg broke by a projectile close to Brawners Farm. Taken from the field, the leg was severed underneath the knee. Richard Ewell - Failure at Gettysburg: Breast fed by his first cousin, Lizinka Campbell Brown, Ewell took ten months to recuperate from the injury. During this time, the two built up a sentimental relationship and were marry in late May 1863. Rejoining Lees armed force, which had quite recently won a staggering triumph at Chancellorsville, Ewell was elevated to lieutenant general on May 23. As Jackson had been injured in the battling and in this manner kicked the bucket, his corps was separated in two. While Ewell got order of the new Second Corps, Lieutenant General A.P. Slope took order of the recently made Third Corps. As Lee started moving north, Ewell caught the Union army at Winchester, VA before crashing into Pennsylvania. The lead components of his corps were approaching the state capital of Harrisburg when Lee arranged him to move south to gather at Gettysburg. Moving toward the town from the north on July 1, Ewells men overpowered Major General Oliver O. Howards XI Corps and components of Major General Abner Dou bledays I Corps. As Union powers fell back and focused on Cemetery Hill, Lee sent requests to Ewell expressing that he was to convey the slope involved by the adversary, in the event that he thought that it was practicable, yet to maintain a strategic distance from a general commitment until the appearance of different divisions of the military. While Ewell had flourished under Jacksons order before in the war, his prosperity had come when his boss had given explicit and exact requests. This methodology was counter to Lees style as the Confederate administrator normally gave optional requests and depended on his subordinates to step up. This had functioned admirably with the intense Jackson and the First Corps leader, Lieutenant General James Longstreet, yet left Ewell in a difficulty. With his men drained and lacking space to re-structure, he requested fortifications from Hills corps. This solicitation was cannot. Getting word that Union fortifications were showing up in huge numbers to his left sid e flank, Ewell ruled against assaulting. He was upheld in this choice by his subordinates, including Major General Jubal Early. This choice, just as Ewells inability to possess close by Culps Hill, were later seriously censured and accused in causing the Confederate annihilation. After the war, many contended that Jackson would not have delayed and would have caught the two slopes. Throughout the following two days, Ewells men mounted assaults against both Cemetery and Culps Hill yet with no accomplishment as Union soldiers had the opportunity to sustain their positions. In the battling on July 3, he was hit in his wooden leg and marginally injured. As Confederate powers withdrew south after the annihilation, Ewell was injured again close Kellys Ford, VA. Despite the fact that Ewell drove Second Corps during the Bristoe Campaign that fall, he later became sick and given order to Early for the resulting Mine Run Campaign. Richard Ewell - The Overland Campaign: With the start of Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Awards Overland Campaign in May 1864, Ewell came back to his order and drew in Union powers during the Battle of the Wilderness. Performing great, he held the line at Saunders Field and later in the fight had Brigadier General John B. Gordon mount an effective flank assault on the Union VI Corps. Ewells activities at the Wilderness were immediately counterbalanced a few days after the fact when he lost his levelheadedness during the Battle of Spotsylvania Court House. Entrusted with protecting the Mule Shoe striking, his corps was overwhelmed on May 12 by a monstrous Union ambush. Hitting his withdrawing men with his blade, Ewell frantically endeavored to get them to come back to the front. Seeing this conduct, Lee intervened, upbraided Ewell, and took individual order of the circumstance. Ewell later continued his post and battled a grisly observation in power at the Harris Farm on May 19. Moving south toward the North Anna, Ewells execution kept on affliction. Accepting the Second Corps officer to be depleted and experiencing his past injuries, Lee diminished Ewell presently and guided him to expect oversight of the Richmond safeguards. From this post, he bolstered Lees tasks during the Siege of Petersburg (June 9, 1864 to April 2, 1865). During this period, Ewells troops kept an eye on the citys entrenchments and crushed Union diversionary endeavors, for example, assaults at Deep Bottom and Chaffins Farm. With the fall of Petersburg on April 3, Ewell had to surrender Richmond and Confederate powers started withdrawing west. Drawn in at Saylers Creek on April 6 by Union powers drove by Major General Philip Sheridan, Ewell and his men were vanquished and he was caught. Richard Ewell - Later Life: Moved to Fort Warren in Boston Harbor, Ewell stayed a Union detainee until July 1865. Paroled, he resigned to his wifes ranch close to Spring Hill, TN. A neighborhood striking, he served on the sheets of a few network associations and furthermore dealt with an effective cotton ranch in Mississippi. Contracting pneumonia in January 1872, Ewell and his better half before long turned out to be gravely sick. Lizinka kicked the bucket on January 22 and was trailed by her significant other three days after the fact. Both were covered in Nashvilles Old City Cemetery. Chosen Sources Common War Trust: Richard EwellCivil War: Richard Ewell HistoryNet: Richard Ewell at Gettysburg

Using an example of an organisation, identify how the change in legislation was implemented and evaluate the impact of this on the service delivery

Our job as social laborers is one of an engaging nature; we are or ought to be focused on balance and restoring equivalent force bases. Advancement of freedom is crucial to our job, consequently I have chosen to take a gander at the usage of the Direct Payments plot, for crippled individuals; acquired under the Community Care (direct Payments) Act 1996. This was gotten as enactment, in view of crippled people groups pressure gatherings, and so as to give debilitated individuals further ‘independence and decision' (Abbot, D (2003)) further to this the Disabled Children Act 2000 stretched out the entrance to Direct Payments to 16 †multi year old handicapped individuals. Inside this paper I will break down the job of social administrations offices for debilitated individuals when the usage. In investigation I will distinguish issues that have emerged from this adjustment comparable to the association of social administrations, the social laborers and administration clients, examining issues of translation, and social change. The enactment engaged nearby specialists to set up ‘Direct Payment' Schemes for handicapped individuals that are qualified for network care administrations, under the network care act however tact was given to neighborhood experts on the best way to execute it. (Network Care, (1999) sept, eighth). On account of this watchfulness the take up and the way of take up to the plan contrasted which brought about next to no development for various years. Husler (no date given) states ‘this enactment is tolerant, which implies boards can not disregard it, however they have discretions on the best way to actualize it' (Ibid). This absence of direction to usage prompted inconsistencies in the execution of the Direct Payments conspire Before the usage of the immediate installments plot, the job of social administrations was to survey the necessities and dangers of the debilitated individual, and through this procedure of appraisal try to limit or control hazard and raise need. This was done through the arrangement of administrations legitimately controlled or dispersed from focal legislature of neighborhood social administrations offices. We find in this circumstance the relationship of intensity was one of maintenance by the social specialist inside a culture of ‘Role' and ‘task' as opposed to individual. Albeit many would contend with this point and express the social work base of this time was one of a ‘person' culture as characterized by Burnes (2000)p.164), where the administration clients needs and wishes are conspicuous with the minimisation of the basic highrachy base. Convenient (1986) would differ with this idea and further contends that western associations work overwhelmingly from a job or assignment orientated social work base. This is obvious in a significant number of the as of late distributed records on working practices and rules on enactment translation, for example, the ‘Working Together Document 2000 and the Assessment Framework 2000. Further, in the event that think back to the advancement of the social administrations and the, at that point Charity Organization Society (COS) established in 1869 we see proof of comparable practice according to current evaluation of requirements. This was likewise done by a COS specialist who made decisions dependent on his of her insight, this is plainly a prior type of means testing (Glasby and Littlechild (2002)). From this appraisal an installment was given to the individual or which at that point was alluded to as ‘relief.' This was in fact annulled in 1834; it kept on being paid by and by well into the twentieth centaury, as a scope of complex measures for the help of the poor as joblessness took off (Thane. P (1996). The Poor Law was at long last nullified in 1948 stopping installments to the poor by social administrations divisions, and swapped by a national plan for the installment of standardized savings benefits and the arrangement of government assistance administrations to the older and the Disabled. This permitted the professional to remove themselves from money installments and the shame of destitution, further this prompted as Becker (1993) states ‘practitioners having little neediness mindfulness (p93) and further survey cash issues similar to the issue of different offices (Davies and Wainwright (1997) cited in Glasby and Littlechild p 61) This craving for the social work calling to remove it self from the nineteenth centaury roots has, brought about the protection from the execution of the Direct Payment Schemes. In spite of the fact that the Direct Payment Scheme is totally different from the early installments made by the COS and prior types of social administrations offices. This opposition has been from the shop floor social specialists to MPs, for example, Virgina Bottomly, who kept in touch with the MP presenting the Private individuals charge preceding first experience with sanction direct installments â€Å"Social administrations enactment is concerned with†¦.services and not with direct installments which is the area of the government managed savings system† (Cited In Hatchett W, (1991): pp 14 †15). Administrative belief system for the usage of the Direct Payments conspire was to mirror the standards of cooperation, consideration and correspondence through contribution decision and freedom. As a result of the absence of clear direction on translation this plan has been confused and further brought about the moderate take up of the plan. Jobs and methodology have changed in divisions which require operational changes, and a further move in the way to deal with the idea of hazard and control (Dawson (2000) cited in Carmichael and Brown (2002) p.804) The inclusion in administration clients lives by social laborers has moved away structure one of evaluation and the in house arrangement of administrations, to one of appraisal and the arrangement of monies to reason singular consideration structure the semi commercial center. This can be customized to meet the individual needs and life of an individual, instead of the one ‘size fits all' mentality of past assistance arrangement (Glasby and Littlechild (2002)) this is in contrast with prior installments being made by the Independent Living Fund in a roundabout way through outsiders (Brindle, D. (2000)) further key focuses to the error and moderate take up of the plan is because of the equivocal wording of the enactments direction the ‘willing and capable models' (Clark and Spafford (2002)) this point contends the administration clients must have the option to ‘choose' direct installments, issues, for example, capacity the to pick have emerged from this direction just as to whom the assignment of installment ought to be made. Who ought to have power over the cash? Is an inquiry the neighborhood specialists have battled with when evaluating individuals with extreme handicaps and individuals with mental debilitates. Specialists have taken this hazy area of the enactment and successfully barred individuals with mental inadequacies on account of the lawful ramifications which brought about the dismissing of an application. Further to this boards have received a top down model in which nearby inability associations are not intently enough required inside. This bureaucratic model is seemingly important as a result of the multifaceted nature of the framework, the workforce need plainly organized job, obligations and lines of order for adequacy (Coulshed and Mullender (2001)) this is for the reasons for responsibility and strength in the framework (Ibid).although this can limit proficient self-rule and offer further protection from change (Aldridge (1996) cited in Coulshed and Mullender, p 31) With the execution of this plan, there was a move away from the old arrangement of social laborer control to that of client control, which social specialists saw as a threat and who have voiced worries of â€Å"vulnerable individuals dealing with their own administrations and whether it is on the whole correct to hazard such installments' (Snell, J. (2000)). This is clear sign as Cyert and March (1963) state ‘confusion over how political limitations on arrangement settle on a pragmatist way to deal with dynamic unthinkable (cited in Burnes. B (2000)) This has prompted social laborers getting dubious with regards to what is required from them, as a result of the job and duty change, just as the social change in the divisions, which has additionally left social specialists feeling debilitated. Force and control is diminished from the social specialist, and rebalanced with the administration client, social laborers have considered this to be an apparent loss of their personality and status. (Clark and Spafford (2002) p 252) Disarray and absence of support in the arranging phases of the conveyance of administrations has left social specialists hating the immediate installments plot, this has additionally prompted moderate take up and moderate data dissemination to support clients. Etienne d'Abouuville (1999) states the plans are struggling in light of the fact that nearby specialists are utilizing social laborers to guidance on direct installments, as opposed to Disabled people groups associations which can give peer support. This is additional proof in the difference in job change in the job of the consideration administrator Glasby and Littlecihild (2002) contend remaining burden suggestions and the low proportion of staff is a solid and potential obstruction to the autonomy of incapacitated individuals. Mullins (1993) remarks on this and states ‘commitment and participation to hierarchical objectives will rely upon how these are seen to be to their greatest advantage'. On the off chance that we take a gander at this with regards to the social specialist who has been offering guidance to the administration client on, businesses' duty, commitments and lawful repercussions without preparing and on their ‘normal' outstanding task at hand we see why social laborers are feeling pushed. Further excessively this hesitant to work in with the plan (Hosler (1999)). Social specialist having little association in the change has prompted this opposition; this is sustained with the troubling of further obligation on the laborer. Mullender and Coulshed contend ‘where structures are experiencing change this is adjusted to all the more rapidly where there are open lines of correspondence and decentralized structures.

United States as a World Superpower

Ashley Torgerson Dr. Earthy colored International Relations second May, 2012 United States as a World Superpower The ascending to the status of world super force doesn't occur without any forethought. To investigate the excursion to the top, we should perceive the battles and impediments that were survived. As Americans we can gladly say that we live in a nation with comprehensively perceived matchless quality. As expressed before, it was anything but a simple title to acquire. Thinking back from the beginning of time we can see explicit instances of how we started our ascent to control and what it has taken to protect our power.Some of our later history has indicated that numerous individuals are addressing how much longer we will have the option to hold this force. I anyway feel emphatically that America can stay a world superpower. America was not generally observed as one of the world’s superpowers. Our ascent to control was centered around a couple of unmistakable main th rusts. These incorporate the ascent of free enterprise, military predominance, and a financial blast all which happened from Post war time, for example, World War II and the Cold War (Baker p. 10). These components added to the picking up of America’s power.It is likewise essential to take a gander at the elements that enabled America to keep this force. Those impacts were encircled around America’s capacity to turn into a command power in the global framework, and keeping up a steady economy (Mandelbaum p. 213). History has demonstrated numerous instances of nations rising and tumbling from power. Because of this numerous Americans feel they we are on a comparative way. Adding to this descending way is the expanding intensity of Asian and Middle Eastern (Bar p. 41). Of these nations China is perceived as one with the most potential.China has increased an expanding job on the planet framework through material abilities, hard powers, and through human or social capaciti es or delicate forces. (Gilley p. 245) China’s greatest draw is its material abilities since it has driven the country to become one the universes quickly developing ventures. â€Å"During the three decades to 2010, China accomplished maybe the most quick supported pace of monetary improvement throughout the entire existence of the human species, with its genuine economy developing very nearly 40-overlap somewhere in the range of 1978 and 2010. † (Unz p. 12) While this shows the immense intensity of China’s financial area, its delicate forces can't be over looked.The Chinese work power underpins its interior interest for items as well as supports that of the many different nations the items are sent as well (Unz p. 11) Without a huge talented work power this may not be conceivable. From these reasons we can infer that China is taking steps the correct way of super force and in years to come may even outperform the United States. Despite the fact that the emergen cy of intensity battle is happening, America won't go down without a battle. â€Å"The United States despite everything has the world's most grounded military. (Walt p. 6). Having a solid military builds up the United States preeminent force as well as it authorizes to different nations that they can keep that power. With power comes a responsibilty. The United States military powers are frequently called upon to intercede in overall issues, showing its strength in global undertakings. Beside military mediation the United States assumes a key job in global undertakings through monetary speculation (Ferguson p. 23). Interest in a broad of regions keeps the economy diverse.We see the impacts of a different economy day by day through items being attractive all around the globe (Brzezinski p. 291). The United States has the accessible assets to accommodate the world market. These components go into making life simpler in the United States, in this manner delivering a general public tha t is living longer and going through more cash (Brzezinski p. 292-294). At last these reasons secure the United States position as predominant force to be reckoned with. Dependent on these different reasons I feel emphatically that the United States has the capacity to stay as a world superpower, not being outperformed by China.It is genuine that numerous components go into deciding a force to be reckoned with however these three stand apart to me: financial steady, military force, and at the highest point of social and social finish of the range. While China may have the financial way to contend, they don't have the predominant military power the United States has. â€Å"United States is the main nation with the way to attack different medium-size nations in different mainlands and still support not many losses. No other nation presently is even close being able to extend military force with such power and range† (Internet Source).The mix of financial soundness and military force has prompted the United States huge effect in the universal framework. Authoritative obligations are constantly put on the world’s predominant force. The United States has managed these obligations regarding numerous decades and has demonstrated its capacity to lead the world in an amicable manner. Anna Applebaum from the dWashington Post composes: â€Å"The United States is a superpower without a partner,† implying that the United States has taken care of the world as a prevailing force for this long and isn't losing handle of that. BibliographyAcademic Journals 1. Bar, Shmuel. â€Å"America's blurring Middle East impact. † Policy Review 166 (2011): 41+. Scholarly OneFile. Web. 22 Mar. 2012. 2. Dough puncher, Andrew. Building a post-war request: the ascent of US authority and the starting points of the Cold War. † CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries Feb. 2012: 1129. Scholarly OneFile. Web. 22 Mar. 2012 3. Ferguson, Yale H. â€Å"Approach es to Defining ‘Empire' and Characterizing United States Influence in the Contemporary World. † International Studies Perspectives 9. 3 (2008): 272+. Scholastic OneFile. Web. 21 Mar. 012. 4. Gilley, Bruce. â€Å"Middle powers during extraordinary force changes: China's ascent and the fate of Canada-US relations. † International Journal 66. 2 (2011): 245+. Scholarly OneFile. Web. 4 May 2012 5. Unz, Ron. â€Å"China's ascent, America's fall: which superpower is increasingly undermined by its ‘extractive elites'? † The American Conservative 11. 5 (2012): 12+. Scholarly OneFile. Web. 4 May 2012. 6. Walt, Stephen M. â€Å"The end of the American period. † The National Interest 116 (2011): 6+. Scholastic OneFile. Web. 4 May 2012. Books 7. Brzezinski, Zbigniew, and Brent Scowcroft.American and the World: discussions on the eventual fate of American international strategy. New York: Basic Books, c2008, 291 p. 8. Mandelbaum, Michael. The cheap superpowe r: America’s worldwide initiative in a desperate time. first ed. New York: Public Affairs, c 2010, 213 p. Paper 9. ANNE APPLEBAUM. â€Å"Superpower without a Partner. ,† The Washington Post, November 24, 2009 Tuesday, Editorial Copy, Pg. A19 782 words Internet 10. Futurist, The. â€Å"Why The US Will Still be the Only Superpower in 2030. † typepad. N. p. , n. d. Web. 4 May 2012. http://futurist. typepad. com/my_weblog/2006/05/why_the_us_will. html

What does Judith Butler mean by the social construction and Essay

What does Judith Butler mean by the social development and performativity of both sex and sexual orientation - Essay Example Social development structures the manner by which collaboration happens. The idea of performativity accommodates an understanding that jobs of sexual orientation and sex are the result of acts that are rehashed and ritualized so as to characterize what is implied by those terms. Indeed, even deviances based on what are viewed as standards become socially developed towards the identifiers of sex and sexual orientation. While Butler talks about these ideas under the umbrella of decisions made, she explains later that what she implies is while social development of both sex and sex are made through the decisions made, they are in no way, shape or form deliberate decisions. The impulse to establish sex or sex through the demonstrations that are considered non-adjusting are likewise sanctioning sex and sex that has been planned by society. The advancement of manners by which to name diverse sexual orientation types, for example, transgender and transvestitism give manners by which to legi timize and see how those authorizations of sex and sex are a piece of human presence. The accompanying paper basically looks at the ideas of social development and performativity so as to comprehend what Butler implies as she examines sex and sex in these terms. Through taking a gander at instances of human presence so as to comprehend her goals, the fundamental components of her way of thinking develop. Post-innovation Post-innovation, as per O’Brien (2009, p. 368) is â€Å"the disposal of all inclusive and dichotomous classifications of, especially, the personality and the acknowledgment of existing together social real factors or certainties, just as proficiencies and identities†. The post-present day idea of distinguishing the development of society depends on the possibility that practically any piece of social collaboration is the aftereffect of the decisions to keep on acting in habits that duplicate, regardless of whether advance, the practices and thoughts reg arding the world where individuals live. Under this sort of speculation there is practically no essential fact of the matter, yet built certainties that characterize the individual, the jobs inside society, the way where those jobs are acted, and the manner by which the developed reality turns into an interrelated arrangement of standards that are irrefutable and basically verifiable. Steward (1993) talks about how the term present current was attributed on her as opposed to assuming the job of a post-innovator all alone. She is by all accounts worried about the propensity for the post-innovator to make clearing speculations while being basic about the condition of the world. Head servant (1993) composes of Charles Jenckes who portrayed a worldly breakdown, which for Butler flagged that there could be no postmodern in light of the fact that there was a void after the advanced period. This breakdown was an indication that there was no ontological establishment on which to manufacture hypothesis. Thusly, it is hard to allude to Butler as a post-pioneer, and yet a considerable lot of her hypotheses can be set into a post-present day structure Butler herself, be that as it may, doesn't see the idea of a post-current system. Hesse-Biber and Leavy, (2007, p. 86) compose that Butler feels that post-innovation is a trick all thought which has no limits to time or importance. Where O’Brien (2009, p. 368) talks about post-innovation as far as separating obstructions to truth, Butler depicts postmodernism as a non-existent and not well characterized idea in which whatever surpassed innovation was lumped so as to figure out how to examine what came after present day thinking. In any case, where Butler tries to

Mohammed Yunus Creating a World Without Poverty Social Business and the Future of Capitalism COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Mohammed Yunus Creating a World Without Poverty Social Business and the Future of Capitalism COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog As mentioned a few weeks ago on this blog, the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Muhammad Yunus, visited SIPA and outlined his vision for a new business model in his talk on Creating A World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism. The event was co-sponsored by Center for the Study of Human Rights, Center for the Humanities, SIPAs Economic Political Development Concentration, and Committee on Global Thought. We are happy to say that his full talk is available for your viewing.   Simply click here to view the video.   The whole presentation is 71 minutes in length.

Mohammed Yunus Creating a World Without Poverty Social Business and the Future of Capitalism COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Mohammed Yunus Creating a World Without Poverty Social Business and the Future of Capitalism COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog As mentioned a few weeks ago on this blog, the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Muhammad Yunus, visited SIPA and outlined his vision for a new business model in his talk on Creating A World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism. The event was co-sponsored by Center for the Study of Human Rights, Center for the Humanities, SIPAs Economic Political Development Concentration, and Committee on Global Thought. We are happy to say that his full talk is available for your viewing.   Simply click here to view the video.   The whole presentation is 71 minutes in length.